I am a long-time admirer of Neale Donald Walsch and have read Conversations With God, from Book 1 throughout. I was reading your article concerning Neale and was appalled when I read the following paragraph.

"This show, hosted by Neale Donald Walsch, world renowned author of the best-selling book series Conversations with God, is an unusual talk radio program featuring real conversations with real people talking about real life. Based on the wisdom from his infamous books, Neale offers many fresh and candid insights on how we can all live more exciting, inspired and productive lives."

I'm not going to rant on about the attrocious grammar exhibited by this paragraph but the term I've enboldened is inexcusable for a forum such as your website. The word "infamous" is defined by Merriam Webster thusly:

1 : having a reputation of the worst kind : notoriously evil <an infamous traitor> 2 : causing or bringing infamy : disgraceful <an infamous crime> 3 : convicted of an offense bringing infamy

How can I not object to such a treatment? How can I not bring this to the attention of Neale and anyone else who might be concerned?

I have one more question and that is, "where did you hire a writer with such poor command of English and a proof-reader that is just as wanting when there are people out-of-work qualified to do this work in line with the quality your organization purports to promote?"

I listen to Lime radio on Sirius almost daily and it does seem to have quality as its theme and that is why I am so appalled this website falls so short of the excellence one would expect.