PrintEmail
Comment
GMOs - Pros and Cons
Posted by Ecobabe on July 2, 2007 - 2:19pm.

Definition:  Genetically Modified Organisms or Food (GMOs) are plants and animals into which scientists have inserted foreign genes for specific, desired traits—such as cold tolerance, insect resistance, drug production, or immunity to common pesticides. GMOs are usually designed to carry one or more genes from a totally unrelated species to another. For instance, in designing cold-tolerant tomatoes, some crop developers have put into the fruit's cells an antifreeze gene from flounder. Ordinarily, crossing such species would be impossible, and even crosses of related species can yield infertile offspring—like the mule from the mating of a horse and donkey. Unlike the mule, however, GMOs remain fertile. This high-tech approach is different from conventional plant or animal breeding for desired traits, in which individuals of a species are repeatedly crossed to bring out what the breeder is looking for in a domestic animal or crop plant.

 Pros:  Despite their potential risks, GMOs offer great benefits to developing countries, according to the U.N. Environment Program. Certain GMOs reduce the need for precious resources, such as water, fertilizer, or pesticides. This technology offer greater yields than conventional crops.

 Cons:  There are many concerns over the safety of these foods as well as the seeds from these plants. Studies have demonstrated that foreign genes in crop plants don't always stay put. Pollen from such plants might carry inserted genes from modified soybeans, for instance, into a field of wild soybean plants or an unmodified crop. The unintentionally broadcast genes could come to dominate in future generations of the wild or supposedly normal crop plants and thus reduce genetic diversity in the species.

Side effects:  The potential of genetically engineered foods to cause allergic reactions in humans is a big reason for opposition to such crops. Although protocols are in place to ask questions about the allergy-causing possibilities, there has been no test that offers definitive answers. But all of that could change as a Michigan State University researcher has developed the first animal model to test whether genetically engineered foods could cause human allergic reactions.

 Discussion:  Where do we stand with this technology that is beneficial on one hand but may harbor potential safety issues? Safety should be our number one concern and preparing for the future food needs of our growing world population should be another. Where do you stand on this issue?




<em>Fraser</em>'s picture
Gross
by Fraser on July 3, 2007 - 1:40am

I doubt I'll ever be on board with GMOs.  I don't want them and  I wouldnt offer them to anyone (that I actually liked).  However, with that being said... the research and studies are fascinating.

~ Greener today than I was yesterday!


<em>patentligitation</em>'s picture
Patent Ligitation
by patentligitation on October 19, 2009 - 4:45am
Yes, I agree, considering that GMO really helps people in terms of making strategies. http://www.generalpatent.com/patent-litigation
<em>DianaRaluca</em>'s picture
GMO is not healthy!
by DianaRaluca on October 29, 2009 - 3:52am

I think it's wrong, we should not play with God's creations. This food is not natural and it does more damage than you think.

They are only doing this because they need cheaper food for more people, but they are destroying  the quality of the food. Have you ever tasted GM tomatoes? They taste nothing like the natural ones.

Diana.

http://www.manastiri-moldova.info/zona/neamt/


<em>madamerebellion</em>'s picture
No GMOs
by madamerebellion on July 3, 2007 - 12:52pm

Great article by the way.

 

 I just can't help but be against almost anything genetically modified though. It's terribly creepy and obviously, well, unnatural. I also think that the cons overrule the pros in this case. I sincerely feel that this should be left alone and we shouldn't really interfere with the natural course of organisms, one thing is evolution and another is actually getting in there and mutating plants or animals ourselves.

 

Thanks for the excellent info, stay green. :) 


<em>Monmac1</em>'s picture
Anti GMO
by Monmac1 on July 3, 2007 - 1:58pm

The idea of GMO's are good and relavent, but I dont think that the con's tilt the scale in a possitive dirrection. Yes we do want to help our enviorment and people of our world, but are we willing to take a risk on genetically altering foods to do that? Risking people and possibly animals lives?

Everything was made unique for a reason. And we should keep it that way!


<em>enigma_v</em>'s picture
It might be a good change.
by enigma_v on July 5, 2007 - 6:53pm

It obviously sounds wrong and its' controversy will indisputably scare many people off, but if genes can be manipulated in this way to make crops grow in marginal areas, then it's not such a bad thing because don't we all want to get rid of world hunger? But of course one can only speculate if it will in fact be used to serve the third world.

 

 


<em>fcgraphicdesign</em>'s picture
We are literally eating mutant plants and animals!
by fcgraphicdesign on December 18, 2007 - 12:54am

It's beyond what nature intended! If scientists cross breed a crop with an insect to make it bug resistant than we are literally eating a crop part insect–a mutant crop!

GMO crops become super weeds taking over the natural environment, we can't rotate crops, the land becomes exhausted.... and the GMO crops won't die ever!

Do what you can to eat organic, our bodies and our brains need real food, not chemically inflicted food that doesn't naturally occur on our planet.

Eat organic! Put it to the test and you'll feel like new person!


<em>cbsunshine</em>'s picture
JUST SAY NO TO GMO
by cbsunshine on December 19, 2007 - 5:02pm
There is absolutely no PRO to this issue.  The UN Environmental Program only promotes it because (I will theorize ) that they may get some kind of kicker to promote it from the big food companies.  Just like we send all of our tainted vaccines to other countries. Let's dig deeper and follow the money trail.  They are getting our trash! We have no idea what the long term effects of consuming and producing the GMO crops are.  Almost 100% of our conventional corn, wheat and soy are GM.  If you do not eat organic beware! Is it not enough that our children are being injected withtoxic vaccines that have other organisms DNA in them, the  food companies want to continue to alter our food and at what cost? There are other ways to help developing countries and this is not one of them.  Just say no to GMO! 

 

Peace,Little Miss Sunshinewww.SunshineOrganics.net


<em>paigep</em>'s picture
GE trees
by paigep on January 9, 2008 - 11:47am

According to a really helpful paper i read, "Ecological and Social Impacts of Fast Growing Timber Plantations and Genetically Modified Trees", GE trees (which are GMOs):

  • herbicide use: Dr. Charles Benbrook found that growers of RoundUp resistant soy increased their overall pesticide use by 11%.
  • insect resistance: the World Wildlife Fund reported: "Bt crops will augment the selection pressure placed on target pests and...will inevitably lead to an increased frequency of Bt resistance genes within insects' gene pool."
  • according to Nature, Bt was found by researchers to exude from plant roots, bind to soil, and remain in an "active, lethal state" for more than seven months mainly due to high concentrations needed for the Bt crops' success.
you can find this paper and more information at: www.dogwoodalliance.org
<em>hkitty5</em>'s picture
Pro GMO
by hkitty5 on March 9, 2008 - 4:38pm

I believe GMO has impacted our society in many great ways. Here is two main ones:

First off, medicine. Most anti-biotic, enzymes, vitamins, vaccines etc are produced by GMO. There just isn’t enough time and resources to produce these medicine. Furthermore, because it is produce in a lab setting, it can be monitored closely.

Secondly, it saves a lot of resources. Take for an example cheese. Most cheese requires an enzyme to change milk into cheese. This enzyme is found naturally in a goat's stomach. Meaning you need to store the milk in a calf's stomach to make cheese. I personally think that is rather unhygienic and very impractical (I mean how many calves are you going to kill?). Fortunately most cheese company thinks so also. Most of the cheese on the market, in US anyways, are made using an enzyme produced from a GE microorganism. The only cheese not produce that way are organic cheese which are produce in the traditional way (in a calf stomach) or vegetarian cheese where the enzyme is produced from a fungus but tastes different. Overall, most GE crop is made because of better yield or just uses less resources, ie water, soil, pesticides.

As for cross pollination, isn’t that a problem in general? Agricultural crops in general are a danger to biodiversity. Historically, agricultural plants are selectively picked because they have a much higher yield. GMO is the same thing just more effectively. Having GMO does not introduce a new danger when the danger of cross pollination is already there. Just because the plant is a GMO does not mean it would have a greater chance of being cross-pollinated than any other agricultural plant.

Furthermore, GMO does NOT mean it is toxic. GMO is genetically modified organism. By recombination, it only changes a particular gene or two (depending on the phenotype) to make the organism a more useful organism. This recombinant process does not produce any toxins. Furthermore, GE food are tested before it ever goes on the market as like other food and to make sure its properties is like others.


<em>cbsunshine</em>'s picture
Toxic - Yes
by cbsunshine on August 11, 2008 - 11:54am

Most GMO's are toxic because they are sprayed with pesticides. They are not pure in form either, so you may not be getting all the nutrients and antioxidants as nature intended. I am reading this fascinating book

Omnivores Dilemma.  Fascinating stuff.

 

Just because it is tested does not mean it is safe or healthy. Do not be fooled. 

 

 

www.sunshineorganics.net

www.holisticmoms.org

www.nvic.org

 


<em>nuovo</em>'s picture
It made me think
by nuovo on May 26, 2009 - 12:32am
We don't actually like GMO but here's the thing, we don't also know what it's all about. We were just informed by someone that it's not good. So we're just staying on the safe side because it's not good to regret in the end. The pros usually focus on the advancement of technology but would it do good to all of the people? That's our main concern.
<em>TanyaFox</em>'s picture
GMOs has sparked significant controversy in many areas
by TanyaFox on May 31, 2009 - 3:53pm
The use of GMOs has sparked significant controversy in many areas.Some groups or individuals see the generation and use of GMO as intolerable meddling with biological states or processes that have naturally evolved over long periods of time, while others are concerned about the limitations of modern science to fully comprehend all of the potential negative ramifications of genetic manipulation.
<em>suzettemarks</em>'s picture
I prefer to eat naturally
by suzettemarks on July 9, 2009 - 11:28pm

I prefer to eat naturally grown produces.

 

-Regards,
Suzette Marks, Health and Fitness / Weight Loss Writer:[Colon Cleansing][Resveratrol Supplement][Acai Berries][Eye Creams][Mineral Cosmetics][Green Tea and Weight Loss].


<em>rentback</em>'s picture
eat organic whenever you can
by rentback on September 15, 2009 - 9:37am

I always try to eat organic foods. The cost is quite prohibitive somethimes though, but prices are coming down.

 


<em>SaffronRouge</em>'s picture
Say No to Frankenfoods!
by SaffronRouge on September 16, 2009 - 10:08pm

A recent editorial in Scientific American, reveals the shocking and alarming reality behind the proliferation of GMO products throughout the food chain of the planet since 1994.  If you are interested in learning more about GMO's, it is certainly worth checking out.  It was the August 2009 issue, if I am not mistaken.


<em>patentligitation</em>'s picture
Patent Attorney
by patentligitation on October 20, 2009 - 7:03am
The idea of GMO's are good and relavant, but I dont think that the con's tilt the scale in a possitive dirrection. Yes we do want to help our enviorment and people of our world, but are we willing to take a risk on genetically altering foods to do that? Risking people and possibly animals lives?
<em>Tile8</em>'s picture
No to GMO
by Tile8 on October 26, 2009 - 8:17pm
I'm defintiely against GMO. Just the fact that Monsanto & Co have purposely deceived consumers and farmers over the years gives me sufficient reason to belive there's something wrong with this path. The fact is that we as men have been used to natural foods for thousands of years so how can we expect our bodies and own genetic make up to adapt to GMO within just a few short years? It would take several generations at least and I very much doubt that our bodies would be in a higher evolved healthy state then. Probably quite the opposite!
<em>SusanKasi</em>'s picture
GMO's and Monarch Butterflies
by SusanKasi on October 29, 2009 - 2:10pm

There have been studies that show a direct relation to GMO crops and the 100%  disappearance of Monarch Butterflies-

 http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2191 


User login


Join Lime Now, it's free