
So maybe I wasn’t very clear in
that last post. Here’s a little recap: I have a 350-square-foot
work studio that’s infested with
carpenter ants; I’m going to
tear it down and
rebuild it with
straw bale walls and
solar thermal panels and a
frost-protected shallow foundation. (Well, there’ll be a little more to it than that, of course. But let’s keep things basic for the moment.) The current building sits on an
uninsulated four-inch slab of concrete, which is a no-no for two reasons: One, that’s not a good enough foundation for Boulder’s building code; and two, leaving it uninsulated means up to 50 percent of the studio’s heat is being sucked through the concrete and into the ground during the cold months. More heat loss not only means cold feets, it means more natural gas burned and electricity consumed by the gas/electric heater I’ve got in there. (It ‘s 95 degrees in Boulder right now, by the way. Slightly challenging to remember the
cruelties of winter in this heat.)
That’s where the frost-protected shallow foundation comes in.
As we discussed, an FPSF basically insulates the ground under your structure. What we’re going to do is lay a new insulated foundation around our existing slab, effectively building an insulated, underground wall around the earth directly below the slab. Make sense? We’ll dig an 18-inch wide, 18-inch deep trench around the perimeter of the existing slab; that’s where the underground wall – the new foundation – will go. While the weight of the current building is supported by the slab, the weight of the new building will be supported by that underground wall.
There are a number of ways to build that new foundation. One is to just pour straight concrete (along with some
rebar), then insulate its exterior with
rigid foam insulation. (Concrete on its own is
not so good on the insulation front.) Two problems with this approach should be obvious to
RRR regulars: One, while concrete is a super durable material—a key consideration in green building—it’s also super energy intensive to produce and ship. And building a three-foot high, 12-inch wide wall in the ground will use a lot of it. Not more than, say, a new, 4,000-prisoner, all-concrete jail would be, but a lot relative to the size of our studio. The other problem is the insulation. What do we know about rigid foam insulation?
Our little ant friends love it. So a three-foot wall of insulation—installed underground—would be a nice new housing project for them. The more foam they chew through, the less
R-value that foam has, the more useless it becomes, and pretty soon we’re back to where we started.
A second way of building the new foundation is to use ICFs –
insulated concrete forms. When you pour a concrete wall, you need something to hold it together in wall-form until the concrete cures. Usually, that’s a plywood or steel “form.” After concrete cures, the forms come down (and usually get reused). ICFs on the other hand are rigid foam forms that stay intact: so the concrete remains sandwiched between two layers of insulation. Useful and handy: no need for plywood forms means fewer resources used.

[That’s not my photo, obviously – we’re quite a ways from pouring a new foundation – it belongs to
these guys. (Shout out to green builders in my hometown Albuquerque!)]
That’s one kind of ICF – the kind we can’t use. (See above: “ants.”) Another kind comes basically in block form – very much like a cinder block – but made out of (usually recycled) polystyrene beads mixed with cement. As I said, like a cinder block, but a very light cinder block. These you can stack like
Legos. The finished wall has narrow-ish channels running vertically and horizontally within that get filled with concrete and rebar. You can build entire houses with these things – in fact, one of the additions to
our house is made out of them, a brand called
Rastra. They have crazy insulating properties, something like R-45. And you use a lot less concrete, like 70 percent less.
The biggest thing about foundations is you can only talk about them for so long. And I think I’ve reached that point for today. But don’t fret, dear reader: On Tuesday I’ll talk more. Right now I’ve got to go files some forms with the county so we can get our
construction drawings approved. Cross those fingers.
I was surprised to find our photo of ICF stem walls on your blog post today, and dismayed to read your comment inferring that we build massive 12 bedroom homes in the desert.
I want to set the record straight. We actually specialize in small, passive/active solar, green homes and have been doing so for over 30 years...since passive solar homes were popular the first time.
One of the most important ways to make a home green is to make it small. A small home consumes fewer resources to build, has a smaller footprint and takes fewer resources to heat, cool and maintain. The home whose stem walls are in the photo is under 2000sf. Our home/office for our company, Sunlight Homes, is under 1500sf.
We have designed larger homes over the years, mostly for large families, but the bulk of our projects especially over the last 5 years have been small homes.
You linked to our main company web site, SunlightHomes.com, in your post, which is an extensive web site and a valuable resource for people wanting to learn about green homes. Our other web site at LittleSunlightHomes.com goes into even more detail about building sustainable/green homes.
Please take another look and you will find that we're on your side!
Margie Davis --Sunlight Homes
After having a good look around the linked Sunlight Homes website it appears obvious to me that y'all DO build sprawling mansions in the desert and perhaps small homes too, but the main website certainly doesn't reflect that. " Sunlight home can be whatever size it needs to be to fit the people who will live there. We can design a home to accommodate a family (or an extended family) of any size."
~ Greener today than I was yesterday!
See, Margie -- that's why people shouldn't go blogging
at 5am, all alone, in the dark, with no coffee in them. (At least, that's what my momma always said.)
You got me. I needed a photo, saw yours online, and grabbed it without thinking. To me, a couple of the houses on your homepage looked ginormous. Maybe I'm just hardwired that way from watching all the new palaces spring up around Colorado's Front Range. But you're right -- building small is building green.
I apologize for hinting that your company is an irresponsible one; it wasn't intentional. And I'm going to edit the post to reflect that.
Glad you're on our side! Hugs?
I understand, Philip, why you're hardwired to think everyone builds large homes because most do. Designers and builders prefer the larger homes because they are more profitable!
While we've always designed solar homes, back in the "old days" the median size of our homes was larger because that's what our customers wanted. It's been encouraging to see how the demand for small homes has increased significantly over the last several years.
A larger home that is well insulated, passive and active solar and uses green materials isn't necessarily a bad thing if there are enough people living in the home to justify the size. We've designed multigenerational homes and it turns out the number of square feet per person is often lower in those cases. More people under one roof can be a greener alternative to urban sprawl. That's why we say, Fraser, that we design for your own family's situation.
We encourage our clients to trim their home size to what they consider to be the minimum they really "need" but some people are not as interested in living as lightly as others. Any improvement is in the right direction and no matter where you fall on the green spectrum, there is always room for improvement.
I applaud your effort, Philip, to educate and inform. Keep up the good work.
And hugs back!
Margie--SunlightHomes.com
. . . the old slab will just sit there in the middle of the new foundation, but not actually on top of it? Is there anything attaching old to new, or do you just expect the two foundations to continue to settle at the same rate? I imagine a hole the shape of your old shed dropping out of the floor of the new one.
I have some friends who are building a crazy off-grid recycle-your-greywater place in the lava plains outside of Grants, and they're using that concrete/polybead stuff for the lower course of walls. It's a wacky material. Very un-massive feeling for something that insulates like it apparently does. I think they're mixing and pouring/molding their own blocks as needed, and then just placing them where they need them.
That's awesome. So they're taking old polystyrene and mixing it up with cement? Man, can you get pictures?
The old slab will indeed sit there. Basically, it's now just the (uninsulated) floor -- it might as well be dirt. As far as I know, anyway. I looked at the construction drawings the other day, but I didn't take a very close look at that detail. I'll look into it, but I bet there's no need to connect them -- to my non-engineer mind, it seems like it'd be better. Trying to integrate material thats been there and in the ground and settling for 20 years to something brand new, with its own settling rate (cement vs. cement + polybead) seems like a bad idea. ?
o0-p[]\
90o;-p]\'
>?ycdz
<quote>So they're taking old polystyrene and mixing it up with cement? Man, can you get pictures?</quote>
I'll see what I can do. I don't think they're completely homebrewing it--I got the feeling it was some mix they bought but then cooked up themselves.